QMS implementation partner for life sciences

Close deviations and CAPAs faster, without loosening control.

QLogix selects, configures, validates and connects quality management systems for biotech, pharma, CDMOs and 503B facilities. Then we add AI workflows that draft, trend and flag, while qualified people review and approve.

Designed around

  • 21 CFR Part 11
  • EU GMP Annex 11
  • GAMP 5 (2nd ed.)
  • ICH Q10

Platform-agnostic. We implement and integrate with your existing quality management system.

Quality systems that record everything and connect nothing

Most sites we see run a capable QMS next to MES, LIMS and ERP systems that never talk to it. The cost shows up in the same places every time.

  • Investigations that start from a blank page

    Each deviation is written up from scratch, so quality varies by author and cycle time depends on who is available.

    Try the simulation
  • Backlogs that age quietly

    Open deviations, CAPAs and change controls pile up without a clear view of which ones carry risk.

    Try the simulation
  • Signals found after the batch

    Trends sit across batch records, lab results and complaints. Nobody sees the pattern until it becomes a recurrence.

    Try the simulation

See it work

Nine short simulations with illustrative data. Each one shows AI doing the groundwork while your people make the call.

From a blank page to an approved CAPA

Illustrative data

AI drafts one candidate per category from the evidence.

Method

Machine

Material

DEV-0139 · problem

Particulates found at visual inspection

Sterile fill, line 2

Measurement

People

Environment

The AI drafts candidates and the CAPA. Your investigator and QA make every decision.

Want to see this with your own systems and data?

Request a meeting

Agents that take on the routine work

Agentic automation handles the gathering, checking, drafting and chasing that fills a quality team's day. Agents work across your systems inside guardrails you define, so routine tasks get done faster, records stay inspection-ready, and your people spend their time on decisions.

Agentic architecture

Illustrative

Orchestrator agent: plans, routes and assembles

Intake agent

  • Complaint inbox
  • Call center
  • Web forms

Investigation agent

  • QMS
  • Batch records

Trending agent

  • LIMS
  • MES
  • QMS

Batch review agent

  • eBR
  • MES

Document agent

  • DMS
  • Regulatory files

Guardrails

  • Least-privilege access per agent
  • Draft-only writes
  • Human approval gates
  • Every tool call in the audit trail
  • Models and prompts under change control

Run a daily task

  1. waiting to start

Why an agentic architecture

  • Routine work runs on schedule

    Huddle prep, overdue chasing and review packs are ready when your team starts the day.

  • One task, many systems

    An orchestrator splits the work across agents that read QMS, LIMS, MES, ERP and documents in parallel.

  • Bounded by design

    Each agent has a defined intended use, only the access it needs, and can draft but not approve.

  • Inspection-ready by default

    Sources, tool calls and drafts are recorded, so an inspector can follow how every output was produced.

  • People stay accountable

    Approvals, dispositions and reportability calls stay with qualified people. Agents bring them the work.

Which routine tasks would you hand to agents first?

Request a meeting

One deviation, start to close

Here is where AI does the groundwork and where your people make the call, at each stage of a deviation.

Deviation logged

AI drafts and flags

  • Drafts the problem statement in IS / IS NOT form from the initial report
  • Flags similar past events across batches, equipment and sites

Your qualified people decide

  • Confirm the facts and the initial impact assessment
  • Decide the classification and whether product is affected

audit trail · 14:02 draft generated · 14:10 routed to QA reviewer

Want to see how this would work with your systems and SOPs?

Request a meeting

What we implement

Five practice areas, delivered separately or as one program.

  • 01

    QMS digitization

    Configured on the platform that fits your size and product type.

    • Deviations
    • CAPA
    • Change control
    • Complaints
    • Document control
    • Training
    • Supplier quality
    • APR/PQR
  • 02

    AI-assisted investigations

    The AI drafts. Your investigators and QA decide.

    • IS / IS NOT problem statements
    • Fishbone
    • 5-Whys
    • CAPA effectiveness checks
  • 03

    Connected quality data

    Your QMS linked to plant and lab systems for trending, recurrence detection and earlier signals.

    • MES
    • LIMS
    • ERP
    • Batch records
  • 04

    Validation of AI-enabled systems

    Risk-based validation following GAMP 5 (Second Edition) and computer software assurance principles, documented for inspection.

    • Intended use
    • Risk assessment
    • Test evidence
    • CSA
  • 05

    Agentic workflow automation

    Orchestrated agents that take on routine quality work across your systems: gathering, checking, drafting and chasing. Each one works inside defined guardrails and hands decisions to your people.

    • Orchestrator and specialist agents
    • Least-privilege access
    • Draft-only writes
    • Human approval gates
    • Audit trail

Built for sites without a large quality IT team

  • Emerging and mid-size biotech and pharma

    Moving from paper or hybrid systems to a validated, connected QMS ahead of clinical or commercial scale.

  • CDMOs and CMOs

    Managing multiple client quality agreements, audits and tech transfers on one system.

  • 503B outsourcing facilities

    Meeting cGMP expectations with lean teams and high batch volume.

How an engagement runs

  1. 01

    Assess

    A QMS readiness assessment: processes, systems, data flows and backlog. We agree baseline metrics before anything changes.

  2. 02

    Design

    Target architecture, platform selection, and a defined intended use and risk level for every AI function.

  3. 03

    Implement and validate

    Configuration, integration, risk-based validation, SOP updates and training.

  4. 04

    Monitor

    Performance monitoring, change control for model updates, and periodic review against the baseline.

Most clients start with the assessment. Book one

AI in a decision-support role, by design

Every workflow we build keeps GxP decisions with qualified people and leaves a record an inspector can follow.

  • Human review and approval for every GxP decision
  • Audit trails and traceability for AI-generated content
  • Data integrity to ALCOA+ expectations
  • Change control for model and prompt updates

Frameworks we work to

  • 21 CFR Part 11
  • 21 CFR Parts 210/211
  • 21 CFR Part 820 (QMSR)
  • EU GMP Annex 11
  • EU GMP Annex 22 (draft)
  • ICH Q9(R1)
  • ICH Q10
  • GAMP 5 (2nd ed.)
  • FDA CSA guidance

Annex 22 is a consultation draft at the time of writing. We design to its direction and update as final text is published.

What we baseline and track

We agree the measures in the assessment and report against them.

  • Cycle time

    Deviation open to close

  • Backlog age

    Open CAPAs and change controls

  • Recurrence

    Repeat deviations by root cause

  • Right first time

    Batch records and investigations

Frequently asked questions

Talk it through with someone who has run a plant

Bring your backlog, your systems map or one investigation that keeps coming back. We will tell you plainly what we would do and what we would leave alone.

In the first meeting we cover

  • Your current QMS and how it connects to MES, LIMS and ERP
  • Where deviations, CAPAs and change controls slow down
  • Whether a readiness assessment makes sense, and what it would cover